Jennifer Agbaire – 糖心传媒 British Association for International and Comparative Education Wed, 04 Mar 2026 17:06:57 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 /wp-content/uploads/2020/04/cropped-baice-square-1-32x32.jpg Jennifer Agbaire – 糖心传媒 32 32 Storytelling as a research methodology /hub/storytelling-as-a-research-methodology/ Tue, 20 Sep 2022 15:45:52 +0000 /?post_type=blog-post&p=33766 This podcast episode is a conversation with the team working on the Ibali network Project. The Ibali Network is a collective of researchers from the UK, Nigeria and South Africa. The team uses storytelling to explore commonalities and differences of how inclusion and exclusion are experienced across education systems in South Africa, Nigeria and the UK, combined with a critical, ethnographic evaluation of the storytelling research process. The study aims to understand how storytelling could be better and more ethically used in research, especially when working across socio-political and geographic boundaries. 

Transcript

00:00:01 Speaker 1

Hello everyone and welcome to the 糖心传媒 Student Podcast, a podcast for postgraduate students in the field of international and comparative education to share advice and ideas to help you through the long process for easier postgraduate study.

00:00:17 Speaker 1

糖心传媒 is the British Association for International and Comparative Education.

00:00:22 Speaker 1

糖心传媒 promotes teaching, research, policy and development in all aspects of international and comparative education and is a diverse professional association composed of academics, researchers, policymakers and members of governmental and non-governmental organisations.

00:00:43 Speaker 1

If you are not already signed up, please check out the 糖心传媒 membership. As a student member, you get access to the 糖心传媒 journal, compare discounts to attend both the 糖心传媒 and update conferences, and access to grants and research, as well as being a member of a grown community of academics. Find out more at 糖心传媒.ac.uk.

00:01:04 Speaker 1

So today I鈥檓 very excited to have the team from the Ibali project on the 糖心传媒 Student podcast to tell us more about this innovative project.

00:01:12 Speaker 1

To unpack the concept of inclusive education and explore storytelling as a methodology, and just to have a really good chat.

00:01:20 Speaker 1

So storytelling in different forms is becoming much more widely used as a research methodology.

00:01:26 Speaker 1

We are lucky enough today to have six amazing women with us from the project, so please can you introduce yourselves and tell the listeners a little bit about your background and how you came to be working on the project and perhaps what made you interested in storytelling in the first place.

00:01:41 Speaker 2

Hi, I鈥檓 Alison Buckler, and I鈥檓 the vice chair of 糖心传媒, so your listeners might know me from that. I am a senior research fellow in international education at the Open University, where I鈥檓 also the Deputy director of the Center for the Study of Global Development.

00:01:58 Speaker 2

And I鈥檓 the PI for this project, which comes together after, nearly five years of working with this.

00:02:08 Speaker 2

Like you say, amazing group of people thinking about storytelling, thinking about inclusion.

00:02:13 Speaker 2

And this, this bid is really the culmination of, you know, five years of thinking about these issues and how we can think about them more deeply come together.

00:02:23 Speaker 1

Great, Alison. Thank you.

00:02:25 Speaker 3

So hi, I鈥檓 Jennifer Agbaire, research associate at the Open University.

00:02:31 Speaker 3

I鈥檓 also the executive secretary of 糖心传媒 and working with Alison on that, on that front as well.

00:02:37 Speaker 3

This project is really something that we have, like Alison said, have been working on for quite some time now.

00:02:43 Speaker 3

We are all kind of interested in, you know, inclusion issues and innovative methods and my work in the past years has been around that very centrally and that鈥檚 where I kind of like really key in.

00:02:56 Speaker 3

I鈥檓 also the project manager on this particular bid as well.

00:03:02 Speaker 1

Thank you, Jennifer.

00:03:06 Speaker 4

Hi, I鈥檓 Joanna Wheeler and I鈥檓 the founder and director of Transformative Story.

00:03:11 Speaker 4

And I鈥檓 also a research fellow at the University of Western Cape in South Africa and I鈥檓 Based in the UK.

00:03:18 Speaker 4

How did I get interested in storytelling?

00:03:21 Speaker 4

Uhm, I mean, I think anyone who has had kids or has taken care of children, has spent many hours, you know, telling stories and listening to stories and so I just, I鈥檓, I am really interested in the ways that stories kind of weave in and out of our lives.

00:03:47 Speaker 4

And I think this project is a great way to learn more about that, and to think more about that critically in different contexts.

00:03:57 Speaker 1

Thank you, Joanna.

00:03:59 Speaker 5

Hi, my name is Faith Mkwananzi and I鈥檓 with the Center for Development support at the University of the Free State. My research is around the areas of inclusion and exclusion in South Africa Indians and I am part of this project because it speaks to the areas that I鈥檓 interested in and also speaks to my own, my own experiences.

00:04:23 Speaker 5

So that鈥檚 why I鈥檓 very passionate about the project.

00:04:27 Speaker 1

Thank you Faith.

00:04:30 Speaker 6

Hello uh my name is Yusra Price.

00:04:34 Speaker 6

I am an anthropologist by training.

00:04:39 Speaker 6

I am passionate about education and storytelling, and my work has been mostly focused in using storytelling to help teach, uhm, ethnography

00:04:57 Speaker 6

And methodologies related, as well as using storytelling to help people tell their story, especially in spaces of advocacy.

00:05:07 Speaker 6

I am part of this project because it speaks to the passions that I have around innovative methodologies.

00:05:18 Speaker 6

I love exploring expressions of art.

00:05:22 Speaker 6

I I love that storytelling as a method and how it invites different ways of doing things, and it brings all of my interests into a central place so there鈥檚 nothing left out.

00:05:38 Speaker 6

And that鈥檚 what I thoroughly enjoy about it.

00:05:43 Speaker 7

Thank you Yusra.

00:05:45 Speaker 7

So my name is Jane Nebe and I鈥檓 an ethnographer on the Ibali project.

00:05:52 Speaker 7

I did my PhD at the University of Bristol where I worked on issues around education, inclusion exclusion and that鈥檚 been the motivation for me joining this project.

00:06:08 Speaker 1

Thank you, Jane.

00:06:09 Speaker 1

OK that鈥檚 a great introduction to you all.

00:06:11 Speaker 1

Thank you.

00:06:12 Speaker 1

Uhm, Alison, I don鈥檛 know if you want to.

00:06:14 Speaker 1

Tell us a bit more about the project.

00:06:19 Speaker 2

Uhm, yes. So this is a two year AHRC funded study that builds on an international storytelling research network that we鈥檝e all been part of.

00:06:29 Speaker 2

For the past five years or so and this new, this new phase of the research is using storytelling approaches with young people and teachers in Nigeria, South Africa and the UK, and the storytelling strand is empirically focused on ideas and experiences of educational inclusion and exclusion.

00:06:49 Speaker 2

So that鈥檚 the kind of empirical.

00:06:50 Speaker 2

Strand of the research and then, in parallel, we are planning a critical exploration of this storytelling work, which is going to be undertaken by three ethnographers, and they are they are trained in Nigeria, South Africa and the UK respectively.

00:07:07 Speaker 2

And the ethnographers will individually and collectively document and analyze the storytelling process in each country.

00:07:13 Speaker 2

So they鈥檒l be exploring how researchers and participants from different contexts and in different contexts make sense of storytelling as a meaningful approach to researching and articulating people lived experiences.

00:07:25 Speaker 2

So really, it鈥檚 a research study.

00:07:27 Speaker 2

On top of or embedded within another research study.

00:07:30 Speaker 2

And the aim of it is, is really to help us think more critically about the House and the whys of the decisions that we make when we鈥檙e researching using creative methods, and especially when we do that in UM and across different contexts.

00:07:43 Speaker 1

OK, so uhm, how did you come to choose these three countries?

00:07:49 Speaker 2

Well, we鈥檝e chosen them because we are from them, and we have collectively, a lot of lived experience and expertise researching, working, being educated, studying in these contexts.

00:08:04 Speaker 2

Uhm, but also we really wanted to explicitly position inclusion as equally relevant across different geographical divides that are often split by this sort of UK based research and then this whole world of development research which kind of others this issue of inclusion.

00:08:21 Speaker 2

So we really wanted to see, and, explore the issue of inclusion across those divides and kind of re calibrate how inclusion is researched.

00:08:29 Speaker 2

In that sense, we were drawing on the work of people who argued that, you know, we need to be using more common analytical frames for doing research under this banner of development.

00:08:43 Speaker 2

And I think as well collectively we are really interested in.

00:08:48 Speaker 2

Thinking more critically about why we choose certain spaces in the world to do our.

00:08:53 Speaker 2

Searching and thinking about what feels comfortable to us, or uncomfortable and why, and we鈥檙e really hoping to get.

00:09:01 Speaker 2

Under the they鈥檙e kind of under the skin of those questions, which in themselves can be really uncomfortable and thinking about and answering them through the ethnography part of the research.

00:09:11 Speaker 2

And then finally, uhm, I think there鈥檚 a there鈥檚 a real ethical justification to come.

00:09:18 Speaker 2

Obviously your listeners will be familiar with the compare journal UM being members of 糖心传媒 and may have read the UM retrospective review of 50 years of compare articles that was published last year and.

00:09:32 Speaker 2

And something that was really interesting that came out of that review is that the, you know, the the dominance of articles that were written with the first author based in a in a high income context, researching education in a low income context and the.

00:09:51 Speaker 2

Uhm, there they were.

00:09:53 Speaker 2

Almost no, maybe none at all.

00:09:55 Speaker 2

No examples of researchers from low income context researching education in high income context, and it was an almost invisible dynamic in the compared journal across the past 50 years.

00:10:05 Speaker 2

So that, uhm, idea of inverting the lens of who researches education where is something that we鈥檙e really interested in as a collective.

00:10:13 Speaker 2

Of people from lots of different contexts with different experience of working in different contexts.

00:10:17 Speaker 2

We鈥檙e really hoping to kind of write about that.

00:10:21 Speaker 2

Yeah, that dynamic as well.

00:10:23 Speaker 1

That鈥檚 really interesting.

00:10:24 Speaker 1

And from that I鈥檝e kind of got two different questions for the group.

00:10:28 Speaker 1

And I realize you鈥檙e at the start of this research, but just to get your opinions and thoughts on this now would be really useful to students.

00:10:34 Speaker 1

So when students are thinking about doing their field work, actually before this, when they鈥檙e thinking about what context to look at and why.

00:10:43 Speaker 1

So now, considering everything you鈥檝e just said, and obviously ideas and opinions on this are shifting very a lot and there鈥檚 a lot of debate around this, do you think there鈥檚 still a place?

00:10:54 Speaker 1

For students from.

00:10:58 Speaker 1

I guess from you know from originating from the UK or from another quite privileged from Northern would say country, do you think there鈥檚 still a place for them to be doing research in the so-called global S you still do you think it鈥檚 still appropriate and if so?

00:11:15 Speaker 1

What do you think can make it more ethical for them to do?

00:11:20 Speaker 5

I, I, I definitely think that there is still space for students in the global North to come and research in the global.

00:11:27 Speaker 5

South, I mean they, they should be open to the, I mean to lending the experience, claiming the life that people lived in the global South and also.

00:11:40 Speaker 5

I think to be open minded about what they may experience in the global South think, which is what storytelling allows because it allows you to be very reflective and open minded.

00:11:51 Speaker 5

About your own experiences and other people鈥檚 experiences and another thing that I think is very important would be to.

00:12:02 Speaker 5

To have a uh mind that鈥檚 open to learning.

00:12:06 Speaker 5

And those learning happens through the people that you are going to meet and the people that are definitely going to be to be working with.

00:12:13 Speaker 5

I think that鈥檚 what鈥檚 going to make it very interesting and useful for a person coming from the global North to the global South.

00:12:22 Speaker 5

I don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 a question of whether or not people in the global North should come in researching the global South, I think the point is.

00:12:29 Speaker 5

Trying to learn from each others experiences and create relationships and networks during that experience.

00:12:37 Speaker 5

Because we can, we cannot isolate the global South from the club or not, and either can we isolate the north from the South.

00:12:45 Speaker 1

So it鈥檚 maybe rather than not coming as you say and it鈥檚 more kind of like.

00:12:52 Speaker 1

A shift in attitude and a shifting kind of perspective and realizing yet coming with an open mind and ready to learn is important.

00:13:00 Speaker 3

I think just to add to that, we鈥檙e not assuming you know that, you know, global N researchers are close minded in any way or we do know that every researcher tends to come to research with preconceived notion.

00:13:15 Speaker 3

If they don鈥檛 check that, I think it鈥檚 what people call unconscious bias, that all of us are really guilty of a different point.

00:13:21 Speaker 3

And we can鈥檛.

00:13:21 Speaker 3

Be guilty of if we鈥檙e not aware of that.

00:13:24 Speaker 3

So I guess just to add to what Faith is saying is really about.

00:13:28 Speaker 3

You know, being reflexive about our positionality as research as when we come into contact, especially those that we are not, you know, we don鈥檛 have a background or lived experience in would be really, really useful.

00:13:43 Speaker 1

And I guess it鈥檚 about being transparent about that isn鈥檛 like you said, Jennifer, just having transparency about your positionality.

00:13:49 Speaker 1

I think it鈥檚 really important from the officer, yeah.

00:13:52 Speaker 2

Well, I think it鈥檚 also about the label, like how you label the work that you do.

00:13:56 Speaker 2

And if you.

00:13:57 Speaker 2

If you say you work in development and then you only work in low income context or research in low income context, then I think that鈥檚 more problematic than kind of individual research.

00:14:07 Speaker 2

Study where you might be from the UK but go into your researching garner for, you know, some personal and professional.

00:14:13 Speaker 2

Intellectual reasons, you might have to be interested in something that鈥檚 going on there.

00:14:17 Speaker 2

And so as part of this project, but also, you know more broadly in 糖心传媒 something that we鈥檙e trying to do a lot more of is not think of international education as a as kind of solely rooted in.

00:14:28 Speaker 2

And then in in development studies which you know is actually quite a recent shift for a lot of the work that people do in 糖心传媒 and just really trying to think back.

00:14:37 Speaker 2

To more the kind of the origins of.

00:14:41 Speaker 2

Comparative education, but putting a modern twist on those and thinking about them in a more critical way.

00:14:46 Speaker 2

But when?

00:14:48 Speaker 2

Is it not just thinking about development research as being something that can only be?

00:14:51 Speaker 2

On in in in low income context, but thinking about development as a global issue and thinking about the work that you鈥檙e doing in low income contexts and how that relates to issues and challenges though so really evident in context that you know wouldn鈥檛 be considered, you know, development contexts in the same way.

00:15:09 Speaker 6

And I mean to add to that I think.

00:15:12 Speaker 6

When it comes to your question, often the apprehension.

00:15:16 Speaker 6

Comes from UM.

00:15:20 Speaker 6

I, I guess, impart a history of people coming in, perhaps from the global N, doing research in the poorest of areas and assuming that they are there to give them something that they do not have, to enrich them with ideas and methods.

00:15:38 Speaker 6

And resources that they do not have, and so it perpetuates this divide.

00:15:46 Speaker 6

That we.

00:15:48 Speaker 6

Yeah, it, it, it perpetuates this divide between, you know, the, the developing country and the developed country.

00:15:55 Speaker 6

And in that it would often take away the agency of people to tell their own stories and this idea of giving voice.

00:16:04 Speaker 6

And so I think that鈥檚 often where the apprehension has come from and I mean in part to some extent my arms would be like yes and no and.

00:16:15 Speaker 6

I think it does come down to what everyone so far has said is that.

00:16:20 Speaker 6

You must know why you are going to a place before you鈥檙e going to do the research in it.

00:16:26 Speaker 6

You鈥檙e not going to do research in Africa because you have never been to Africa, or you are going to witness the poor African people and so on because then already.

00:16:34 Speaker 6

Your ideas are skewed, uhm.

00:16:37 Speaker 6

And it鈥檚 definitely about understanding what positionality means for you, where you are, where you come from, and where you鈥檙e going.

00:16:46 Speaker 6

And like they say, it is like being open minded to the experiences, but also being open to those moments where people confront you and say.

00:16:55 Speaker 6

What are you doing here?

00:16:57 Speaker 6

Or why do you think?

00:16:59 Speaker 6

The research that you are doing is useful or like in because people can often confront you and they could, you know, come up into your face and in those moments you鈥檙e going to have.

00:17:09 Speaker 6

To respond to them.

00:17:11 Speaker 6

And uhm, because it鈥檚 I think what what鈥檚 often echoed is that people are sometimes a bit exhausted.

00:17:20 Speaker 6

By having these tropes and ideas of Africa or developing countries or low income spaces, just being is just perpetuating this idea of what is here.

00:17:34 Speaker 6

Uhm, you know, when we鈥檝e all we when, when so many of us are in that space where we are really working towards collaboration and the give and take of it.

00:17:44 Speaker 6

Also, I think when it comes to a student deciding whether they want to do their research in the global S, not just Africa, but UM.

00:17:54 Speaker 6

You know they need to sincerely have a critical conversation with themselves and reach out to peers and supervisors and mentors in having that conversation before.

00:18:06 Speaker 6

And during and after.

00:18:10 Speaker 1

Thank you.

00:18:11 Speaker 1

All right.

00:18:12 Speaker 1

Sorry, Alison.

00:18:13 Speaker 2

Well, I think, I absolutely agree with what you were saying and I think it really comes.

00:18:19 Speaker 2

Down to the questions you鈥檙e asking and the reasons you鈥檙e going to those contexts to do the research in.

00:18:24 Speaker 2

And again, if you go back to the, the sort of the.

00:18:27 Speaker 2

Uhm, you know, the early days of comparative education. And, you know, I鈥檓 saying this with the, you know, understanding that there are there are other challenges with the way that people framed research in the 1960s that we could spend ages discussing. But the primary focus of comparative education research in the 1960s was to go to other countries.

00:18:46 Speaker 2

To learn lessons, to bring back, to improve.

00:18:49 Speaker 2

You own education system and now we鈥檙e appointing a part of education where the main reason people go to research in other countries is to improve them.

00:18:56 Speaker 2

And I think that鈥檚 the dynamic that I find really interesting.

00:19:00 Speaker 2

It鈥檚 like why are you going to research in this place?

00:19:02 Speaker 2

Is it because you think you鈥檝e got the skills to improve it, or are you actually trying to learn from it to contribute to a bigger global narrative?

00:19:09 Speaker 2

On you know how children can learn better.

00:19:14 Speaker 1

That鈥檚 great. Thank you.

00:19:16 Speaker 1

So the project also other than storytelling, which we鈥檙e going to move on to in a second, but also talks about inclusive education.

00:19:24 Speaker 1

So just again.

00:19:25 Speaker 1

Open to the group.

00:19:26 Speaker 1

Uhm, what do you consider?

00:19:28 Speaker 1

This the so.

00:19:28 Speaker 1

Much debate and sometimes misrepresentation of what inclusive education is.

00:19:33 Speaker 1

So what does that mean to?

00:19:34 Speaker 1

You as a collective.

00:19:37 Speaker 3

Uh, I think that鈥檚 a very interesting question and that really motivated what we鈥檙e doing in the research the entire design of our understanding of how we want to do this.

00:19:47 Speaker 3

Is really built on.

00:19:48 Speaker 3

How we are thinking about inclusive education, the term inclusion.

00:19:52 Speaker 3

We think that is really very under conceptualized.

00:19:56 Speaker 3

We think that is such.

00:19:57 Speaker 3

Above development word, now that people just really use the term inclusion and we, we also think that you know.

00:20:08 Speaker 3

We don鈥檛 think that there is there. There is a specific definition of inclusion that will be A1 size fits all. A kind of definition, right?

00:20:19 Speaker 3

We think that we should put more thought into what we consider not just inclusive education, but how we research.

00:20:28 Speaker 3

Inclusive education.

00:20:29 Speaker 3

And so we can鈥檛 be talking about inclusivity when we are not, you know, also trying to see how we are aligning that to our practice of knowing about inclusivity.

00:20:41 Speaker 3

So that is what is really informing what we are doing.

00:20:43 Speaker 3

We think that inclusion is out there and we think that really engaging with people lived experiences of what inclusion might mean to them in similar and different contexts would give us a better understanding of what.

00:20:56 Speaker 3

That really is.

00:20:57 Speaker 3

And that doesn鈥檛 really apply to 1 context that has been described.

00:21:01 Speaker 3

As underdeveloped or.

00:21:04 Speaker 3

But we might just be really surprised to see that these are things that cause across, you know, very many diverse contexts.

00:21:12 Speaker 3

So yes, inclusion is inclusion.

00:21:15 Speaker 3

But it鈥檚 something that needs to, we need to, we need to conceptualize more.

00:21:20 Speaker 3

We need to theorize more.

00:21:21 Speaker 3

We need to think about more.

00:21:23 Speaker 3

And we need to engage with more through what people, how people make meaning of what that might mean within outside the education space.

00:21:34 Speaker 2

I I think from when we were writing the bids.

00:21:39 Speaker 2

You know, there鈥檚 this sort of pressure to pin down what you mean by inclusion and we, you know we鈥檝e been reading about these things and writing about them for years and you know we obviously had a sort of starting point.

00:21:50 Speaker 2

So, you know, UNESCO has got some quite useful, UM, definitions of what it means to be included in in education.

00:22:00 Speaker 2

And one of the framings that we鈥檙e bringing to the project is the idea you know is Amartya Sen鈥檚 capability approach and so one of the ways we鈥檙e thinking about it is you know he, he, he says you know kind of famous questions that he posed.

00:22:13 Speaker 2

Was equality of what?

00:22:16 Speaker 2

And we are one of our starting points for this research.

00:22:20 Speaker 2

Is inclusion in what you know, what does it mean to young people and to their teachers?

00:22:24 Speaker 2

For UM.

00:22:26 Speaker 2

For them to be included or excluded from their learning.

00:22:29 Speaker 2

And so by using the storytelling approach, UM, that鈥檚 something we鈥檙e really trying to understand.

00:22:33 Speaker 2

Like, you know.

00:22:34 Speaker 2

Inclusion in what from their perspectives.

00:22:39 Speaker 1

And that鈥檚 great.

00:22:40 Speaker 1

And that really talks into as well, the power of storytelling.

00:22:45 Speaker 1

Which I think is really important.

00:22:46 Speaker 1

I鈥檓 a huge fan of storytelling in my own research, and I just think storytelling on any kind of, UM, not just to do with education in lots of different ways.

00:22:55 Speaker 1

As we鈥檝e already touched on, this is such a powerful form to get information across and people narrative.

00:23:02 Speaker 1

So in relation to your research, what do you mean by storytelling?

00:23:07 Speaker 1

Another big question for you.

00:23:11 Speaker 4

I think that鈥檚 a it鈥檚 a really.

00:23:12 Speaker 4

Good question and a little bit like inclusion.

00:23:16 Speaker 4

You know, it鈥檚 quite a fashionable term right now.

00:23:20 Speaker 4

There鈥檚, you know, so many.

00:23:22 Speaker 4

Uhm, ways that it鈥檚 coming up and talked about and a lot of excitement about it.

00:23:30 Speaker 4

You know, sometimes in academia and sometimes less so in academia, but not necessarily that much clear conceptualization of what?

00:23:41 Speaker 4

It is.

00:23:42 Speaker 4

Methodologically speaking.

00:23:45 Speaker 4

So I think for us, one of the things that has helped drive our interest in working together is a shared sense of what we mean by storytelling that has come together over time.

00:23:58 Speaker 4

And it so it鈥檚 really important to be clear about what we mean.

00:24:02 Speaker 4

So when we鈥檙e talking about storytelling, we鈥檙e focusing not just on the stories that are produced, but on the process of how stories are told.

00:24:11 Speaker 4

Old, which means that storytelling.

00:24:14 Speaker 4

We鈥檙e looking at storytelling as a relational activity.

00:24:17 Speaker 4

It has someone who is telling a story and someone who is listening to the story at the same time, and both of those aspects are important to understanding storytelling.

00:24:29 Speaker 4

We also look at storytelling.

00:24:32 Speaker 4

As a creative and iterative process, which means that we are not using this methodology in search of the story.

00:24:42 Speaker 4

You know a singular story the right story.

00:24:46 Speaker 4

But more seeing storytelling, particularly autobiographical storytelling, which is what we鈥檙e working with as being about the way that we make sense of our experiences to ourselves and to others.

00:25:02 Speaker 4

And that means that you have multiple versions of a story that you might.

00:25:07 Speaker 4

And part of what we鈥檙e doing methodologically is working through those different versions so that the person who is telling the story can craft the version that they choose to craft.

00:25:19 Speaker 4

Through that process, so.

00:25:20 Speaker 4

So therefore you have to also have lots of different ways of being creative because stories are expressed not just in words, they鈥檙e expressed in many other ways.

00:25:32 Speaker 4

And as researchers and as facilitators, we then want to bring all those different dimensions into the.

00:25:39 Speaker 4

Storytelling process so when so when I.

00:25:42 Speaker 4

Say that it鈥檚.

00:25:43 Speaker 4

Creative I mean that we use lots of different forms of creative expression.

00:25:47 Speaker 4

So we might use theater, we might use.

00:25:48 Speaker 4

Movement we might use.

00:25:50 Speaker 4

Making or sculpture or drawing or.

00:25:55 Speaker 4

Silence or creative writing or music.

00:25:58 Speaker 4

So any form of expression could potentially be part of a storytelling process.

00:26:06 Speaker 4

But what we鈥檙e also thinking about is how does thinking about story structure help you to move through those different expressions of what the story is?

00:26:19 Speaker 4

So I guess that鈥檚 not, it鈥檚 not a very I鈥檝e not given you a very academic definition, but.

00:26:25 Speaker 4

More a kind of.

00:26:27 Speaker 4

Sort of what, what, what does it really mean in practice that we do and I think that.

00:26:34 Speaker 4

That that could hopefully be helpful for students to hear because sometimes we get a bit lost in the in the theory and don鈥檛 really come down to land on what it actually means in practice.

00:26:50 Speaker 1

So with that in mind, when you鈥檙e saying that, it鈥檚 not you.

00:26:52 Speaker 1

Know you haven鈥檛 given.

00:26:53 Speaker 1

A particular academic kind of response to that.

00:26:57 Speaker 1

So my next question would be then what makes storytelling research so for students that may be?

00:27:04 Speaker 1

Uhm, haven鈥檛 considered using this kind of methodology before.

00:27:08 Speaker 1

Maybe in the past they鈥檝e been used to using.

00:27:11 Speaker 1

May be quite quantitative.

00:27:13 Speaker 1

Kind of methodologies or uhm, they use more traditional kind of interviewing techniques?

00:27:20 Speaker 1

Uhm, could you just explain to him a bit more that what makes storytelling research?

00:27:25 Speaker 3

The question about, you know, what makes storytelling research?

00:27:30 Speaker 3

I, I, well, I think the response to that is perhaps to think about what we constitute as research in very simple terms.

00:27:37 Speaker 3

What does Social Research do?

00:27:39 Speaker 3

What鈥檚 the purpose of, let鈥檚 say, qualitative research?

00:27:44 Speaker 3

We, we classify which we will classify storytelling on the simply I think it is.

00:27:52 Speaker 3

About working with people to understand their realities and explore how these might in turn generate knowledge that creates an understanding of the issues that we as researchers are concerned with.

00:28:04 Speaker 3

If that鈥檚 the case, then definitely there is no question about, you know, whether storytelling is a research or what.

00:28:12 Speaker 3

Makes it a research, but it is an approach that does exactly that, only it does this through a, I would say an epistemological and ontological process that tends towards being more inclusive, you know, one that鈥檚 kind of aims to create.

00:28:27 Speaker 3

Uh, to a great extent.

00:28:29 Speaker 3

A space where traditional research power hierarchies are flattened.

00:28:34 Speaker 3

Uh, storytelling as a research practice also tends to move our ways of knowing in a traditionally central academic space to something that is less exclusionary, a less exclusionary space in that sense.

00:28:52 Speaker 3

So that鈥檚 that there might.

00:28:54 Speaker 3

I鈥檝e read around arguments that say, well, you know, you can just.

00:28:58 Speaker 3

We tell stories all the time.

00:29:00 Speaker 3

I mean, we get people to talk to us about things that are happening with them.

00:29:04 Speaker 3

How can we then classify that kind of knowledge that we get as storytelling and students might actually grapple with defending that, you know, in to some maybe examiners.

00:29:19 Speaker 3

Supervisors, for example, who might?

00:29:21 Speaker 3

Not be taken to the idea of just going out there.

00:29:24 Speaker 3

To get.

00:29:25 Speaker 3

Stories from people.

00:29:26 Speaker 3

I would say that the reality that, you know, a storytelling approach tend to align with more indigenous ways of knowing, you know, that are not typically academic.

00:29:36 Speaker 3

Ways of knowing does not take away from, you know, it鈥檚 research.

00:29:42 Speaker 3

It鈥檚 the potential that it has to help us to understand the realities that research set out to, to understand, to explore the lived experiences of people, to engage, to connect in ways.

00:29:55 Speaker 3

You know that.

00:29:56 Speaker 3

The research a researcher under participant would normally do, and it鈥檚 a question of knowing as a research and what you are using the storytelling approach for.

00:30:05 Speaker 3

What are you going out there to find out?

00:30:07 Speaker 3

Why are you going out there to do this kind of thing?

00:30:10 Speaker 3

How can you justify the ethical implications of this?

00:30:14 Speaker 3

All of this feed into the approach.

00:30:16 Speaker 3

It fits into the design, feeds into how you carry out risk and storytelling research and I think that that is core.

00:30:22 Speaker 3

Uh, to understanding why it is research in the first place.

00:30:28 Speaker 1

I think there鈥檚 something to be said as well.

00:30:29 Speaker 1

Isn鈥檛 there about the?

00:30:32 Speaker 1

Output being accessible too often accessible to people that aren鈥檛 in the academic sphere.

00:30:37 Speaker 1

That鈥檚 still important, that this work is you know, reaches and that they understand.

00:30:42 Speaker 1

And what鈥檚 come out of it?

00:30:43 Speaker 1

And the lessons learn.

00:30:44 Speaker 1

And it鈥檚 a really accessible kind of output, I think, which is really important.

00:30:49 Speaker 4

I was just.

00:30:49 Speaker 4

Thinking about the question, Jennifer鈥檚 answer to the question and I think.

00:30:56 Speaker 4

Another part of the answer is that.

00:31:00 Speaker 4

If we take a step back and look critically at the field of Social Research and qualitative research, we can identify certain biases, historical and current biases, within our own field of research.

00:31:17 Speaker 4

I mean, there are many.

00:31:18 Speaker 4

There鈥檚 no point listing them all here, but certainly one of them is that it鈥檚 heavily text based.

00:31:25 Speaker 4

So if you think about the process of interviewing for example, or focus groups, the researcher decides the questions, goes and asks the questions of a group of people or an individual rights down there.

00:31:37 Speaker 4

Answers and then decides what the those answers mean.

00:31:42 Speaker 4

And then writes about.

00:31:44 Speaker 4

So storytelling is research in in that it makes us question some of those assumptions about what counts as knowledge, who gets to decide the meaning of that knowledge, and how that knowledge is then used.

00:32:02 Speaker 4

And I think that that鈥檚 one of the really.

00:32:04 Speaker 4

Interesting features of it, as you said Emma, that the story itself takes on a life of its own which is not controlled by the researcher.

00:32:14 Speaker 4

You know, the person who鈥檚 told the story can decide what they鈥檙e doing with it.

00:32:17 Speaker 4

So where does that leave?

00:32:19 Speaker 4

You know what the role of the researcher and how do we take account of all the different forms of knowledge that are created in the storytelling process?

00:32:27 Speaker 4

So all of those questions then come in to thinking about how storytelling is research.

00:32:34 Speaker 4

And I think that if we really engage with them, it can potentially help us broaden our horizons of how we see research.

00:32:47 Speaker 2

And I think if I, I again, building on those two answers for me, coming in with a background in education, one of the reasons storytelling research is so fascinating to me, or the idea of stories as research is, you know, my work is, is really rooted in social, cultural ideas around how people learn.

00:33:07 Speaker 2

Is about people learning together, and you learn through the conversations that you have.

00:33:13 Speaker 2

And actually, more conventional forms of qualitative research sort of really contradict that idea of collective learning, as Joanna and Jennifer were saying, because there鈥檚 all this power, so you鈥檙e controlling that knowledge.

00:33:23 Speaker 2

You鈥檙e not opening yourself up to come to being.

00:33:27 Speaker 2

To learning from it and.

00:33:31 Speaker 2

I really like what Walter Benjamin says about the difference between a story and a piece of information and a piece of information is sort of, he says.

00:33:42 Speaker 2

It鈥檚 kind of shot through with guidance on how to understand that and that鈥檚 what a lot.

00:33:46 Speaker 2

Of other qualitative research comes with.

00:33:49 Speaker 2

It鈥檚 kind of tells you how to read something, whereas what a story is, it doesn鈥檛 come with that guidance.

00:33:55 Speaker 2

It鈥檚 up to you to interpret it and that鈥檚.

00:33:57 Speaker 2

Where I find really exciting is how kind of storytelling as research doesn鈥檛.

00:34:03 Speaker 2

Give people the answers.

00:34:05 Speaker 2

It just helped people to think about issues in different ways and that鈥檚, I鈥檓 sure that鈥檚 a quote from one of our articles or blogs, because I feel like I鈥檝e said that, or we鈥檝e written that lots of times before, but it鈥檚 about this kind of what.

00:34:17 Speaker 2

And Hannah Aaron would call this objective in between or what Santos would call the contact zone.

00:34:23 Speaker 2

I think for me, storytelling can be researched and is really powerful as research because it opens you up to seeing these spaces where people are coming together to learn together through the through the narrative of the story.

00:34:38 Speaker 1

OK, now you just mentioned your blog, which I鈥檇 just like to.

00:34:42 Speaker 1

Actually, Faith did you have something to say? And then I鈥檒l come back to the blog.

00:34:46 Speaker 1

Sorry, Faith.

00:34:47 Speaker 5

Yeah, I mean, I wanted to add to what Alison just said, I also think that, you know, using storytelling, it really goes beyond the instrumentalisation of research participants, especially those that we view to be from poor backgrounds because it does give participants the agency and the freedom to decide what stories they want to tell.

00:35:13 Speaker 1

Brilliant. Thank you.

00:35:16 Speaker 1

So Alison you mentioned the blog and the blog on the 糖心传媒 website which all the students should take a look at.

00:35:22 Speaker 1

It鈥檚 really great, really accessible and super interesting.

00:35:26 Speaker 1

But that also reflects on the risks associated with using storytelling as a methodology.

00:35:31 Speaker 1

Could you explain these a bit more to the listener and maybe students are considering using these methodologies maybe?

00:35:37 Speaker 1

Any advice that they can have to counter these risks?

00:35:41 Speaker 6

So this this is actually a question that I brought up earlier so.

00:35:47 Speaker 6

In work that I in storytelling work that I鈥檝e been using.

00:35:51 Speaker 6

Uhm, outside of the body project, but also definitely strongly related to.

00:35:57 Speaker 6

Was in working with what we鈥檇 call vulnerable groups of people.

00:36:03 Speaker 6

From people with migrant refugee asylum seeking backgrounds.

00:36:08 Speaker 6

Uhm, people who experience various forms of violence is on a daily basis.

00:36:15 Speaker 6

And never in storytelling would you want to exclude anyone from being able to participate in this process of, you know, having the opportunity to tell your own story using your own forms of expression and getting it out there.

00:36:31 Speaker 6

And one of the concerns that was brought to my attention was around retraumatization was one of them, but also it鈥檚 I think in thinking of risk when it comes to the storytelling process is it鈥檚 in, you know, the risk that sits with the participants or the people, the storytellers themselves, you know you are opening up stories and experiences of yourself that you know you wouldn鈥檛 have told otherwise and then also, as a facilitator, you can never be prepared for all there is, nor can you list them.

00:37:14 Speaker 6

Things happen spontaneously in the workshop. That puts you in a, you know, ethical conundrum. And so in thinking about risk is not just about you mitigating risk for the participants themselves, but also caring for yourself and your colleagues within that process.

00:37:35 Speaker 6

And I think when it came when in thinking about the risk of you know people feeling deep discomfort, people having trauma resurface and more it鈥檚 what we have bought into a kind of a support network or forms.

00:37:55 Speaker 6

Of care.

00:37:57 Speaker 6

What comes over the top of my head is that we put things in place.

00:38:02 Speaker 6

Four people so like psychological support, support and trauma, social worker of these children and more.

00:38:10 Speaker 6

And if we are working with organisations, is also negotiating with organisations, what forms of care is important and other people that we need present.

00:38:21 Speaker 6

In those workshop spaces, uhm.

00:38:25 Speaker 6

Also, what I think is very important is the closed group when it comes to the the storytelling.

00:38:35 Speaker 6

The whole point is to have a closed space, almost.

00:38:38 Speaker 6

It鈥檚 the facilitators, it鈥檚 the participant, and you people is not meant to come in and out, you know, you can鈥檛 just allow anybody to permeate the space, because there is.

00:38:51 Speaker 6

It鈥檚 you.

00:38:51 Speaker 6

You鈥檙e so highly vulnerable when you鈥檙e telling a story, any story.

00:38:57 Speaker 6

And so within the there鈥檚 also the fact that people, at the end of the day, their stories for them.

00:39:05 Speaker 6

So in terms of like dissemination or shading it further it they really become the ones who decide that and they鈥檙e always if we could help them figure out whether it鈥檚 something they would want to share and the implications of shading in different spaces.

00:39:21 Speaker 6

As for the facilitators, it鈥檚 so, so important to debrief with one another.

00:39:28 Speaker 6

And sometimes what might affect you might not affect the next person, and so you cannot always foresee what might cause you deep discomfort.

00:39:39 Speaker 6

Uhm, you know, compared to someone else.

00:39:42 Speaker 6

So definitely debriefing and having someone to speak to afterwards.

00:39:46 Speaker 6

And it definitely helps that we have one another to speak to.

00:39:50 Speaker 6

You know we鈥檝e, we earlier we spoke about what kind, what kind of work would go into it and how much time we actually spend reflecting on the day that has just passed.

00:40:02 Speaker 6

Or sharing with one another something that has happened in the day that maybe no one else has seen?

00:40:08 Speaker 6

It鈥檚 because your eyes can鈥檛 be everywhere all at the same time, so it鈥檚 also just having the time afterwards as facilitators to do.

00:40:15 Speaker 6

But even and speak with one another and support one another and so.

00:40:20 Speaker 6

I think, yeah, that鈥檚 it鈥檚 the point that I鈥檓 making is that I can鈥檛 at all in any way list various kinds of risks that would come from this.

00:40:31 Speaker 6

UM, but that鈥檚 the risk.

00:40:34 Speaker 6

In different ways is a part of it.

00:40:39 Speaker 7

Alright, so just following on what is Roger said the whole notion of which that鈥檚.

00:40:47 Speaker 7

One cannot fully answer page all of the risk out there.

00:40:53 Speaker 7

We can only try your best before going onto the field.

00:40:58 Speaker 7

OK.

00:40:58 Speaker 7

But then again, I think as facilitators while on the field, one has to be continuously reflective because?

00:41:09 Speaker 7

Uhm, within this situation?

00:41:13 Speaker 7

Look, it look like there鈥檚 no risk.

00:41:16 Speaker 7

But when you go back and think about what has happened or what is happening for time, you can then envisage, likely with writing for arising form in an incident or something that happened.

00:41:28 Speaker 7

So I think as well such as we should continuously.

00:41:32 Speaker 7

You cannot fully anticipate audience even why in this section sometimes you would encounter or BTC likely which possibilities after?

00:41:44 Speaker 7

Don鈥檛 search.

00:41:45 Speaker 7

Thank you.

00:41:48 Speaker 1

I think that鈥檚 so interesting and you both really touch on that kind of element of when you鈥檙e working with people and they鈥檙e giving their story that it鈥檚 the respect that鈥檚 required around it and it is actually real privilege I think to be in that space and to be receiving that story and.

00:42:02 Speaker 1

I really like how that was put across.

00:42:06 Speaker 1

Thank you.

00:42:08 Speaker 1

So I I guess.

00:42:09 Speaker 1

With when people are doing students and.

00:42:12 Speaker 1

Conducting research or.

00:42:14 Speaker 1

Uhm, more advanced academics are conducting research then it鈥檚.

00:42:18 Speaker 1

There鈥檚 always that kind of, UM, having to evidence things, isn鈥檛 there?

00:42:21 Speaker 1

There鈥檚 always that kind of having to back things up.

00:42:23 Speaker 1

So how do you know?

00:42:24 Speaker 1

In this circumstance, 鈥檆ause.

00:42:25 Speaker 1

Obviously it鈥檚 not like you鈥檙e doing, UM.

00:42:29 Speaker 1

Research that you鈥檙e like in a in a hard science that you鈥檙e backing up or that you can check or UM, so how do you know that story?

00:42:37 Speaker 1

Is true.

00:42:41 Speaker 7

OK, so there are two ways to look at that question.

00:42:46 Speaker 7

Now, if the story is true, you can look at it from the angle of whether the story is genuine or authentic, or you can look at it from the angle of what.

00:43:00 Speaker 7

The process of getting this story is rigorous, all right, if you recall what Joanna said.

00:43:08 Speaker 7

And for our research, what storytelling means to us is not the idea of this perfect story, but the process of construction.

00:43:19 Speaker 7

You know the meaning, how people make sense of something that that has happened to them or something that is happening to them.

00:43:28 Speaker 7

You know how the constructor can construct meaning of their lived experiences, so in that sense.

00:43:34 Speaker 7

The focus of research will not be to identify whether the story is true or not, but trying to understand how they have been able to construct meaning from the way they have presented the story.

00:43:49 Speaker 7

Then when it comes to the other dimension of regal, the process of getting this story.

00:43:55 Speaker 7

How are we truly authentically getting this story as it should be done?

00:44:01 Speaker 7

I think Joanna will be able to answer that better.

00:44:05 Speaker 7

Yeah, I mean it.

00:44:07 Speaker 7

It鈥檚 a.

00:44:07 Speaker 4

Really interesting question, and I think as Jane said the question of whether or not the story is true, it kind of assumes that there is a truth to be found in this story.

00:44:21 Speaker 4

So if we let.

00:44:22 Speaker 4

Go of that idea and recognize that the story is about, as Jane said, is about the storyteller making meaning.

00:44:32 Speaker 4

Through the story, then, the question is not whether or not it鈥檚 true, but is this the best version of the story that the storyteller wants to create?

00:44:42 Speaker 4

And so the therefore I guess when we look at sort of what we mean by quality or rigor and storytelling, you know you can do storytelling it at lots of different levels of depth and the process that we鈥檝e been talking about is a five day process at a minimum.

00:45:02 Speaker 4

That鈥檚 very different from a one hour interview, you know, and that鈥檚 not to say that you couldn鈥檛 get a narrative from a one hour interview, but it will be different from the type of story that we鈥檙e talking about that is created through an extended process.

00:45:21 Speaker 4

So I think the question of truth in this story is really more about.

00:45:30 Speaker 4

Uhm, the level of expression that is in the story.

00:45:34 Speaker 4

And when you see a story where someone is very confident in their expression of that story, it.

00:45:44 Speaker 4

Really comes across in the story itself.

00:45:47 Speaker 4

There鈥檚 a quality to that story that is different from other ones.

00:45:52 Speaker 4

And that I think is what we鈥檙e hoping for, you know, for participants to feel like they can they can achieve in their own story and that looks very different for each person.

00:46:02 Speaker 4

It鈥檚 not the same.

00:46:04 Speaker 4

The stories are all different, just like the people are all different.

00:46:09 Speaker 1

So you started.

00:46:09 Speaker 1

To talk a bit there about that process of uhm, that it鈥檚, you know, it鈥檚 an extended process.

00:46:15 Speaker 1

It isn鈥檛 just something that you do very quickly, so could you maybe let students know maybe what a typical day looks like?

00:46:23 Speaker 1

Uhm, when you鈥檙e doing storytelling research and how do you facilitate?

00:46:29 Speaker 1

The approach what do you need to be prepared for.

00:46:33 Speaker 2

Well, I think the first thing to say is that this is not an off the shelf method that you can.

00:46:41 Speaker 2

Do in this context and this context, and over here and with these people.

00:46:46 Speaker 2

There鈥檚 a there鈥檚 a set of common sort of principles and activities that we use in this approach that we might use in different contexts.

00:46:55 Speaker 2

But the actual way that workshop would happen in different contexts is very dependent on the, UM, the research question that you鈥檙e interested in the people that you鈥檙e working with.

00:47:07 Speaker 2

The time that you have.

00:47:08 Speaker 2

The age of the people that you know, the familiarity of the group with each other and very practically your budget is a really, you know, big consideration.

00:47:18 Speaker 2

So you鈥檝e got all these things and every workshop would, you know, we would spend weeks and weeks planning and.

00:47:27 Speaker 2

But in terms of the sort of format I guess.

00:47:33 Speaker 2

And again, others feel free to come in who鈥檝e done it in different.

00:47:35 Speaker 2

Contexts but the.

00:47:37 Speaker 2

The idea is so the end the end result of the workshop is a for each participant too.

00:47:46 Speaker 2

Come away with a 3 to 5 minute digital story, which will be a narration of their story over a series of images that is recorded on a on a tablet.

00:47:55 Speaker 2

So and that will be their story.

00:47:58 Speaker 2

And in the process of getting there involves a whole range of activities that help people to sort of zoom out and see their whole life and then zoom in on a particular issue and maybe zoom out again in again and moving between these different kind of levels of thinking about their story across the week and then.

00:48:18 Speaker 2

Helping them to.

00:48:21 Speaker 2

To kind of decide on the what their story might be about and then helping them to generate a construct a narrative around that around that uhm instance or occasion or event that they that they have chosen to write about and.

00:48:36 Speaker 2

We would do that through a whole a huge range of activities on an individual level and in a group level really high energy.

00:48:46 Speaker 2

Activities and then much more quiet and reflective ones come, you know, using, as Joanna said earlier, lots of different kind of modes of expression.

00:48:54 Speaker 2

So drama and art and collage and.

00:48:58 Speaker 2

And so on and so on and then uh.

00:49:01 Speaker 2

Are uh really core?

00:49:04 Speaker 2

Sort of strand of the UM, workshop is the story circle.

00:49:09 Speaker 2

Uh, because this is a this is a process that鈥檚 based on iterative story development, and the story will change and develop across the across the week or across the period of the workshop.

00:49:18 Speaker 2

And in the story circle, UM, the participants come together and share their story, and they鈥檒l do that multiple times.

00:49:25 Speaker 2

Uhm, and in each story circle, they would have a a critical friend and there will be prompt questions.

00:49:31 Speaker 2

So even though the story that they tell is is very much a personal process, sorry, a personal story, the process.

00:49:38 Speaker 2

Of generating that.

00:49:39 Speaker 2

Story it is a collective activity.

00:49:44 Speaker 2

So that that is a kind of snapshot, but then there would be loads of different ways that it would vary.

00:49:48 Speaker 2

So Faith and I are doing a storytelling process with, UM, adolescent girls and Zimbabwe and most of whom have only.

00:49:57 Speaker 2

Had a couple of years of formal schooling and so one of the UM.

00:50:03 Speaker 2

Kind of tweaks.

00:50:04 Speaker 2

That to the design.

00:50:05 Speaker 2

So this is all based on Joanna sort of approach that she鈥檚 bringing into this group and one of the tweaks that we made for those involving research was this.

00:50:13 Speaker 2

The entire workshop is text free, so it鈥檚 a it was a week long workshop on storytelling without using any text and we had loads of different ways of helping the girls to articulate UM.

00:50:24 Speaker 2

Their story without having to read anything or write anything down.

00:50:27 Speaker 2

And that was a, you know, a big attempt to make that that workshop really inclusive of.

00:50:32 Speaker 2

You know, the girl who had the lead.

00:50:33 Speaker 2

Just the least educationally stability to be able to read and write, but making it the same for everybody so she didn鈥檛 feel like she was losing out by not being able to read and write.

00:50:42 Speaker 2

And I鈥檓 sure other people have loads.

00:50:44 Speaker 2

Of different examples on how it might look different in different contexts with different people.

00:50:49 Speaker 1

I think that鈥檚 really important, isn鈥檛 it?

00:50:50 Speaker 1

The contextuality of it is just is really important and even.

00:50:57 Speaker 1

You鈥檙e saying the workshops adapt and change depending who you鈥檙e working with and et cetera, but do you think it鈥檚 also important for students if they鈥檙e going to come?

00:51:07 Speaker 1

Do this methodology and to make it part of their research.

00:51:11 Speaker 1

To do some level of training as well.

00:51:13 Speaker 1

Uhm, I know I had a great opportunity to attend some workshops myself and also making your own digital stories.

00:51:19 Speaker 1

Really helpful, isn鈥檛 it?

00:51:20 Speaker 1

Because then you understand the process that other people are going through.

00:51:25 Speaker 1

Nodding to agree.

00:51:28

Thank you.

00:51:30 Speaker 5

Alright, so let me first speak to my experience. I started considering and using storytelling in 2017 and prior to that I.

00:51:41 Speaker 5

Had never thought.

00:51:42 Speaker 5

Of it as a method that could be used in academic research.

00:51:47 Speaker 5

And I I became exposed to storytelling.

00:51:51 Speaker 5

By reading other people鈥檚 work and subsequently using it in the small projects that I was, I was part of them.

00:51:59 Speaker 5

And I guess the 10 for me was when I attended a workshop, a storytelling workshop in Cape Town in 2018, where I saw the potential actually of the method and decided that this is what I wanted to do with most of the projects that I was going to be part of their.

00:52:19 Speaker 5

After so knowing what I know now.

00:52:23 Speaker 5

About the potential and the challenges that that come with using storytelling that Yusra mentioned, I would definitely encourage anyone who鈥檚 thinking about using storytelling to think about the things that we have already discussed and also be really honest to themselves in terms of why they want to use.

00:52:44 Speaker 5

Storytelling as a method.

00:52:45 Speaker 5

So for example, you would ask yourself questions such as.

00:52:49 Speaker 5

Why am I interested in and why?

00:52:52 Speaker 5

And what is it that storytelling can do that other research methods cannot do?

00:52:58 Speaker 5

And what鈥檚 in it for the participants?

00:53:02 Speaker 5

What is?

00:53:03 Speaker 5

What is it that the people participating are going to get out of the process and out of the output?

00:53:09 Speaker 5

So for me those are very important questions to ask before considering storytelling.

00:53:15 Speaker 5

And I mean similar to choosing context that was discussed earlier.

00:53:21 Speaker 5

You would need to be sincere about the intention because storytelling is beyond hearing and listening to people stories.

00:53:30 Speaker 5

It was a lot in the process and after we鈥檝e actually exited the field as we call it research, so I think.

00:53:41 Speaker 5

Most of the answers to those questions would require reading widely, obviously.

00:53:47 Speaker 5

What storytelling and other methods?

00:53:50 Speaker 5

Because then that鈥檚 going to help you make the decision and the choice, but most importantly.

00:53:56 Speaker 5

I鈥檓 not sure that it would be a good idea to just go to the field and say I鈥檓 going to you very telling without getting some orientation in the form of it can be seminars, it can be workshops like I attended or some maybe attending.

00:54:16 Speaker 5

Webinars on storytelling?

00:54:18 Speaker 5

Uh, because I think, like I said it, there is a lot involved in the storing storytelling process.

00:54:25 Speaker 5

Like what USRA and others have already highlighted.

00:54:28 Speaker 5

It鈥檚 quite a lot of ethical challenge.

00:54:30 Speaker 5

Changes that would come with it for both facilitators and participants.

00:54:36 Speaker 5

So for example, you have emotions involved, you have time, we have money involved and other risks that are part of the process.

00:54:45 Speaker 5

So I guess as someone who has been both.

00:54:50 Speaker 5

A participant in the facilitator in the storytelling process.

00:54:55 Speaker 5

And seeing how rewarding the storytelling process is for both participants and researchers or facilitators alike, I would definitely encourage anyone considering this.

00:55:10 Speaker 5

If at all possible, attend a storytelling web shop.

00:55:15 Speaker 5

And be a participant first, then you will be in a position to be able to facilitate because you learn a lot.

00:55:22 Speaker 5

Uh, by just being a participant?

00:55:25

Right.

00:55:26 Speaker 1

You really do.

00:55:27 Speaker 1

I think understanding the process and what the participant goes through is just invaluable.

00:55:33 Speaker 1

Jennifer, did you have something to add?

00:55:35 Speaker 3

I was just saying that I totally agree to everything that Faith has said and which really feeds into what you strong was saying earlier about, you know, all that needs to be considered.

00:55:46 Speaker 3

In the process of what to prepare.

00:55:48 Speaker 3

For I think.

00:55:49 Speaker 3

For a PhD student, in addition to that is really.

00:55:52 Speaker 3

Be realistically thinking about what is possible within the scope of a PhD study.

00:55:58 Speaker 3

You know, the time limits that I involved, you know, for you to think about because you might have, you know, yeah, you would have to think about, you know, the restrictions that you might have, you know, it depends in some context, for example because of.

00:56:11 Speaker 3

All of these.

00:56:12 Speaker 3

Strong ethical implications that are there.

00:56:17 Speaker 3

You know I鈥檓 working in Uganda now where you take it may take you like 22 months to get ethical. Clarence Forest or attended research that is as intensive and rigorous as we are. You know we; we are advocating. So those are some kind of issues to think about but also.

00:56:34 Speaker 3

The elements of collaboration in facilitating a storytelling workshop is really, really, in my experience, really key.

00:56:43 Speaker 3

I think about, you know, haven鈥檛 also been a participant and a facilitator.

00:56:48 Speaker 3

I think about how I would have gone through the process if I didn鈥檛 have a Joanna there, or Alison or a Faith, but.

00:56:55 Speaker 3

You know, and now that we鈥檙e going forward with it, I still, you know, think about how really useful it is to have that kind of collaboration in in really successfully pulling off.

00:57:08 Speaker 3

A workshop, it鈥檚 it.

00:57:10 Speaker 3

It comes in.

00:57:11 Speaker 3

Just not just about the friendship that you would need to lean on if you if you can鈥檛 have that, but also the care you know the handling of the tensions and the pressures that would come in, the constant reflection on your, you know, your own facilitation.

00:57:29 Speaker 3

And you know how that鈥檚 working for everyone, you know, reaching out to the participants.

00:57:34 Speaker 3

Sometimes it鈥檚 also really.

00:57:37 Speaker 3

Easier or even doable when you have that collaboration.

00:57:41 Speaker 3

So for a PhD student who might intend to be a lone worker.

00:57:45 Speaker 3

Uh, in a storytelling approach, you know, it might be important to consider whether that might be possible within the scope of the PhD work, and whether to consider really after the training and everything, getting some kind of support.

00:58:01 Speaker 3

Uh, in that respect, in terms of facilitation, things we鈥檙e going through, but also thinking about what that might mean for those who would be supporting, it鈥檚 your PhD.

00:58:09 Speaker 3

And when you talk about output, for example, what might they be interested in that and what would they get?

00:58:14 Speaker 3

So all of those kind of, you know things are really like.

00:58:19 Speaker 3

Important to think about for a PG I feel if I鈥檓 honest, I would really recommend an early career researcher and a PhD student to maybe consider the storytelling approach, which I think is really uh.

00:58:38 Speaker 3

An interesting a fascinating, fascinating, fascinating, and a useful way to do research even at PhD studies.

00:58:46 Speaker 3

Is what elements of a period of a storytelling approach would be useful could enrich you know your research, you.

00:58:54 Speaker 3

You could go on, you know, after your PhD for example, to do something more elaborate, more extensive.

00:59:00 Speaker 3

You know, if you don鈥檛 have the resources and the support to do it at that level.

00:59:04 Speaker 3

But what elements of the storytelling approach?

00:59:06 Speaker 3

Could at this moment more realistically and practically support and enrich your work and maybe think about that more in moving forward with the approach for your PhD.

00:59:18 Speaker 1

Yeah, and the solutions of that as well could be working with like a local organization, couldn鈥檛 it?

00:59:22 Speaker 1

I know for my PhD I鈥檝e been working with a local organization that already works strongly with the community, and for them it鈥檚 been.

00:59:30 Speaker 1

Uhm, useful process for them as well and sharing the stories for their own advocacy.

00:59:35 Speaker 1

So it鈥檚 kind of like it鈥檚 not only given me kind of people to work alongside and to help invaluably with, but also it鈥檚 to know that it鈥檚 of use to them is really important as well, I think.

00:59:48 Speaker 6

So, I mean we鈥檙e talking about the storytelling methodology and approach, but.

00:59:53 Speaker 6

Well, what鈥檚, what鈥檚 very useful and insightful about the process itself is that there are elements.

01:00:00 Speaker 6

I mean, we鈥檝e also speaking earlier about there are elements of storytelling that can help people do different forms of expression.

01:00:07 Speaker 6

So it鈥檚 like Jennifer is definitely there are there are pieces to storytelling that can help people.

01:00:14 Speaker 6

Articulate something.

01:00:16 Speaker 6

You know, one of the one of the activities we do is like there over of life.

01:00:20 Speaker 6

You know, using the metaphorical river in drawing and illustrating it to talk through a a topic or prompt or an experience and so that that that there is an element of the story to the fuller storytelling process that you could use in conjunction perhaps like with.

01:00:40 Speaker 6

With interviewing and so on.

01:00:41 Speaker 6

So it鈥檚 not to say that, you know, in order to do storytelling, it鈥檚.

01:00:45 Speaker 6

It鈥檚 either or.

01:00:46 Speaker 6

You either you either going to use it or you鈥檙e not going to use it.

01:00:49 Speaker 6

But you can take inspiration from the storytelling method itself and incorporate that into the methods that you are interested in you.

01:00:56 Speaker 6

Using and what I also want is I I鈥檓 thinking about a friend of mine.

01:01:02 Speaker 6

She takes such keen interest in storytelling, but she is so, so anxious and she cannot imagine herself being in a room facilitating it.

01:01:18 Speaker 6

So like, you know, how do you then uhm, what鈥檚 nice about storytelling as a method and in the process itself is that there are different elements to it that you can use.

01:01:32 Speaker 6

To kind of cater to your comfort and what you feel capable of doing.

01:01:37 Speaker 6

And so sometimes it could be a remote facilitation even there is just 鈥o I was also thinking about like you know, if you are interested in the method but you are also so anxious about being the main facilitator.

01:01:51 Speaker 6

Like Jennifer said, having a network of people to support you is super, super important because that鈥檚 where your advice lies, your debriefing lies.

01:02:01 Speaker 6

Uhm, but that there are also ways to think creatively about this that can make you feel comfortable in facilitating it differently.

01:02:13 Speaker 6

You don鈥檛 have to be super extroverted all the time like everyone in this podcast.

01:02:21 Speaker 1

I guess, like Jennifer Connor said as well, you need to remember sometimes as a PhD student that your PhD hopefully isn鈥檛 the last piece of research you鈥檙e going to.

01:02:28 Speaker 1

Be involved with.

01:02:29 Speaker 1

So even just touching on an element like you鈥檙e saying can be really then lead to more involvement with digital stories or different forms of storytelling over research as well?

01:02:38 Speaker 2

Yeah, I guess, I think one of the things that I love the most about being in this collective is that we all come to it with distinct expertise and interests, and it鈥檚 a real embodiment of social cultural learning, which is what my background is in and it鈥檚, you know, it鈥檚 happening in practice and I absolutely love that and I it, it runs really counter to this other narrative in academia, which is this kind of this superstar academic who doesn鈥檛 need anyone else who has all the, you know, forced our F papers and all the big Pi grants and yeah, exactly. And, and I think the challenge for PhD students is that that.

01:03:27 Speaker 2

That you know.

01:03:29 Speaker 2

Well, it鈥檚 actually quite a short period of your academic career overall is really focused on pushing you towards this identity, it being a sort of an independent.

01:03:36 Speaker 2

And research.

01:03:37 Speaker 2

Yeah, not working in a collective.

01:03:39 Speaker 2

And so I think that it鈥檚 hard in the PhD to work in a collective because you have to be constantly proving that it鈥檚, you know, independent.

01:03:47 Speaker 2

A thought and that it鈥檚, you know, it鈥檚 you own that knowledge generation so you can jump through the hoop of getting the PhD and I think that鈥檚 the real.

01:03:56 Speaker 2

It鈥檚, it鈥檚 one of the big challenges, right, reflecting back on, you know, having done a PhD, I think, and now supervising students who really want to work collectively, but having to kind of caution them about, you know.

01:04:07 Speaker 2

How far they can go with that within the within the confines of the PhD is really challenging and.

01:04:13 Speaker 2

But I think, you know, again on the other hand, we really don鈥檛 want to say that you can鈥檛 do this within a PhD in like Bushra and Jennifer.

01:04:20 Speaker 2

And Faith has said it鈥檚 about elements of it and Jennifer speaks really articulately about how she had already done her PhD.

01:04:28 Speaker 2

I mean, she can explain it better, but she only got her data when she started looking at storytelling.

01:04:33 Speaker 2

And then it was through understanding storytelling and the kind of epistemological shifts that she went through made her think completely differently about the data that she鈥檇 already got.

01:04:44 Speaker 2

You have to say it much more articulately than we can.

01:04:48 Speaker 1

This meant we鈥檇 onto actually my last question, Jennifer, but I just want to say before I move to the last question and then I鈥檒l come straight back to Jennifer with that because I don鈥檛 want to keep you too long.

01:04:58 Speaker 1

Is there any quick, very quickly, is there any reading that people should be doing?

01:05:02 Speaker 1

And can you signpost people to about digital storytelling?

01:05:07 Speaker 2

Well, I mean, Joanne has written a lot about this, so I鈥檇 put you towards.

01:05:12 Speaker 2

Joanne鈥檚 work and I I really love and I always come back to Michael Jackson鈥檚 work from the politics of story telling. His book. Uhm, I think that鈥檚, you know, really talks really beautifully about.

01:05:25 Speaker 2

You know, especially the thing the question earlier about truth and stories and you know, he鈥檚 he writes really wonderfully about.

01:05:31 Speaker 2

You know, even the stories that we tell ourselves in our heads aren鈥檛 true because they鈥檙e how we make sense of things to ourselves and that, you know, that that really resonates with the work that we do.

01:05:44 Speaker 2

Recently we鈥檝e been thinking about UM, so a lot of Hannah Arendt鈥檚 work is obviously very relevant to the work of storytelling and this idea of the subjective in between. But we鈥檙e trying to sort of.

01:05:55 Speaker 2

Maybe move away from Hannah Arendt, work a little bit and think about.

01:05:58 Speaker 2

A you thinking about that idea in a different way?

01:06:03 Speaker 2

And Santhosh, his work about contact zones.

01:06:05 Speaker 2

Uhm, I find really helpful in thinking about the kind of intercultural translation and how story stories put you at that point where you鈥檙e forced to come to translate and.

01:06:15 Speaker 2

It鈥檚 what comes out of that translation that is the really fascinating thing about stories.

01:06:19 Speaker 2

They鈥檇 be my top three.

01:06:22 Speaker 1

Right, and I鈥檒l put links to them as well.

01:06:25 Speaker 1

On the 糖心传媒 website.

01:06:26 Speaker 1

With their podcast.

01:06:28 Speaker 1

So something that we鈥檙e going to be asking all our guests on the podcast, which I鈥檓 going to start with Jennifer, just to put you on the spot because of what Alison mentioned earlier is.

01:06:37 Speaker 1

Uhm, what?

01:06:38 Speaker 1

You wish you鈥檇 been told as a PhD student that you now know and didn鈥檛 know that?

01:06:43 Speaker 3

Well, that鈥檚 them.

01:06:44 Speaker 3

I could, I could write the whole thesis on that.

01:06:49 Speaker 3

I tend to keep it very short.

01:06:54 Speaker 3

Very, very short, but I think it鈥檚 for me, it鈥檚 about, you know.

01:06:59 Speaker 3

What it really means to be a either an insider or outsider in a research process.

01:07:07 Speaker 3

How that is really nuanced and how that doesn鈥檛 necessarily.

01:07:13 Speaker 3

Always tie down tight, tight to or only links to your background or where you鈥檝e lived or how much you鈥檝e lived there.

01:07:23 Speaker 3

I鈥檓 saying this because of my specific case of having been a Nigerian who was researching Nigeria and I was very at home with the idea, you know, of research.

01:07:33 Speaker 3

In Nigeria, I had a supervisor who was really.

01:07:36 Speaker 3

We who had lot of experience, you know in working in the Nigerian context as well.

01:07:41 Speaker 3

So she really cheered me on but I think she did try to raise my awareness of how sleeping I was constituting myself as a Nigerian and.

01:07:56 Speaker 3

My knowledge of context how that really is.

01:07:58 Speaker 3

To that she, she, she, she.

01:08:00 Speaker 3

** *** signaled from the beginning that you would need to calm down a little bit about what you think you know about context, because that means everything about how you engage with your participants, how you go ahead to even be open enough to know, uh, and to learn from the process.

01:08:20 Speaker 3

I took her advice, of course.

01:08:21 Speaker 1

So trying to get past another like assumptions, trying to trying to get past our assumption.

01:08:23 Speaker 3

Yeah, exactly.

01:08:25 Speaker 3

But I wish that, you know, I had done.

01:08:29 Speaker 3

I I wish that I had really engaged with that more deeply or I have.

01:08:34 Speaker 3

I was really pushed to do that more because it was a shock, you know, to a very large extent when I went into the field and.

01:08:43 Speaker 3

Even though before that I had written all about how I might be an outsider.

01:08:48 Speaker 3

Even though I鈥檓 an insider, because I was in a comparative reason.

01:08:52 Speaker 3

That was for between the northern and the southern part of Nigeria.

01:08:57 Speaker 3

And, you know, eventually my entire argument became about how you shouldn鈥檛 really homogenize anywhere, even within specific regions of a national boundary.

01:09:07 Speaker 3

So you can鈥檛 even homogenize the entire T of the north, for example, but also about.

01:09:12 Speaker 3

The kind of effect that has on the researcher who is going out there and feeling more confident about being, you know, part of the process.

01:09:20 Speaker 3

I鈥檓 trying to distinguish themselves from someone who would be a total include outsider, so I think the meaning of otherness.

01:09:27 Speaker 3

In this case has been really deeper that we would think it is and how to really engage with that constantly you know as you go on and not take for granted at all what positionality really means within research.

01:09:42 Speaker 3

I think that鈥檚 something I鈥檝e wish I knew more about or I engaged with in a.

01:09:49 Speaker 3

A level at that time.

01:09:52 Speaker 3

I know all about it now at last.

01:09:58 Speaker 1

Obviously, OK, I do, you know, go.

01:10:00 Speaker 7

Right.

01:10:04 Speaker 7

I think it鈥檚 a.

01:10:05 Speaker 5

For me it鈥檚 really a difficult one.

01:10:10 Speaker 5

Yeah, because most of the my PhD research was definitely was driven by my own, my own experiences as a migrant.

01:10:20 Speaker 5

So I understood my personality welfare, but I think knowing what I know now in terms of methodology.

01:10:31 Speaker 5

I would have really considered, uh, using some elements of storytelling because what I did in my PhD was narrative interviews, but I was not familiar with the storytelling methodology then.

01:10:50 Speaker 5

Yeah, but if I would have to go back to the field, I would definitely consider storytelling because I think there鈥檚 some rich stories that I missed from.

01:11:03 Speaker 5

Uh, from the participants that I was working with, and I think they those stories may have driven my passion maybe in a different direction, but I do see that there are lot of migration and issue migration and education issues that are very.

01:11:20 Speaker 5

Contentious nowadays, which I feel like I didn鈥檛 do justice to then because of my lack of knowledge in terms of methodology.

01:11:30 Speaker 1

Thank you, Joanna.

01:11:34 Speaker 4

Oh, it鈥檚 a really.

01:11:36 Speaker 4

I haven鈥檛 thought about that for a long time.

01:11:38 Speaker 4

It kind of while since my PhD uhm.

01:11:45 Speaker 4

I remember I remember someone telling me in the course of my PhD I forgot who it was.

01:11:49 Speaker 4

Now I think it was one of my colleagues where I was working that uhm.

01:11:56 Speaker 4

When you鈥檙e doing the PhD, it feels like the most important thing that you鈥檒l ever do or ever write.

01:12:01 Speaker 4

And then when you finish it, you realize.

01:12:04 Speaker 4

That it鈥檚 probably not.

01:12:07 Speaker 2

That鈥檚 what, that鈥檚 what blood man told me.

01:12:10 Speaker 4

Is it OK?

01:12:11 Speaker 4

Clearly there鈥檚 like a handbook for supervisors where this gets put in it, but I remember, you know, when I was in inside the PhD, It was so hard to keep that perspective because it just felt.

01:12:26 Speaker 4

All consuming like nothing could possibly be more important than what I was doing in.

01:12:31 Speaker 4

The PhD it.

01:12:32 Speaker 4

Was the most important thing I had to think about all the time, you know?

01:12:37 Speaker 4

And it was really only.

01:12:40 Speaker 4

Afterwards that I was able to see that.

01:12:44 Speaker 4

It鈥檚 a lot better.

01:12:46 Speaker 4

It would have been a lot better if I could have treated the PA.

01:12:48 Speaker 4

HD more like what it was, which is a stage in an academic career rather than the defining moment of who you are and who.

01:12:58 Speaker 4

You will be forever and ever.

01:13:00 Speaker 4

Uh, so I I think.

01:13:03 Speaker 4

But it鈥檚.

01:13:03 Speaker 4

It鈥檚 very hard.

01:13:04 Speaker 4

To do that, because there鈥檚 so much about the structure of a PhD that pushes it into every corner of your being.

01:13:14 Speaker 4

That it can really take over.

01:13:15 Speaker 4

And I think I was lucky that when I was doing my PhD I was working and I had two kids, so.

01:13:26 Speaker 1

What鈥檚 grounded developers then as well, do it.

01:13:26 Speaker 4

I did.

01:13:26 Speaker 4

It part time.

01:13:28 Speaker 1

You鈥檝e got to yeah, can鈥檛.

01:13:30 Speaker 1

Compute, so I had.

01:13:31 Speaker 4

To sometimes leave it, you know.

01:13:33 Speaker 4

Yeah, but, but aside from that, I think, you know, it doesn鈥檛.

01:13:38 Speaker 4

I wish I had known that.

01:13:40 Speaker 4

It doesn鈥檛 have to define what you will be doing as an academic in the future.

01:13:46 Speaker 4

Yeah, you know, you can, you can go through the PhD and you can also leave it behind, although of course you still take it with you, but you know you can go in other directions.

01:13:55 Speaker 1

We can shift focus on meeting, yeah.

01:13:58 Speaker 4

Yeah, yeah.

01:13:59 Speaker 4

But at the time, you know, it just felt like it was so鈥

01:14:02 Speaker 1

That鈥檚 really important for students to hear, actually.

01:14:03 Speaker 4

It鈥檚 just.

01:14:06 Speaker 4

Yeah, yeah.

01:14:08 Speaker 4

It will be over.

01:14:09 Speaker 4

And you can. You can.

01:14:10 Speaker 1

Wrong night.

01:14:11 Speaker 4

There can be other pathways that you don鈥檛 see when you鈥檙e in it.

01:14:14 Speaker 4

They鈥檙e just sort of hidden because you鈥檙e so, you know, focused on the PhD.

01:14:22 Speaker 6

As someone who has not yet done their PhD, I have been battling with it for a long for a longish time, so there are so many people who are encouraging me to do the PhD as this natural next step in my academic career.

01:14:47 Speaker 6

And I still hold this thing where I say that.

01:14:53 Speaker 6

I鈥檝e always imagined that any PhD I do will become part of something else.

01:15:07 Speaker 6

So what I mean by that is that I鈥檝e always imagined that a PhD and the work I do comes alive.

01:15:13 Speaker 6

And that dissertation and the red robe and the certificate that says I鈥檝e officially clocked university.

01:15:19 Speaker 6

Uhm, will be the formality of it, but that I would want to create something that I can return to once I鈥檝e submitted everything and.

01:15:31 Speaker 6

I haven鈥檛 found what it is that I want to do.

01:15:36 Speaker 6

At times I feel like there鈥檚 a clock ticking.

01:15:39 Speaker 6

You know something that鈥檚 chasing me there saying, you know you are turning 51, uh, you鈥檙e gonna have to start doing a PhD Sometime real soon if you want to be eligible for funding.

01:15:54 Speaker 6

And so I鈥檓 defiant in that I鈥檓 actually going to go study a second master鈥檚 because.

01:16:01 Speaker 6

It鈥檚 something that鈥檚 going to contribute to the to the actual career that I鈥檓 forging and creating, but I don鈥檛, I鈥檝e not yet let go of the PhD So I think I鈥檓 in a very fortunate space and place because I have people who have already done the PhDs and I have a support network of, you know, people who established in their various careers.

01:16:26 Speaker 6

And then I always make use of my support network is 1.

01:16:31 Speaker 6

Whether Joanna wants to receive messages and voice notes from me or not, I will send it to you.

01:16:39 Speaker 6

So I guess I guess I would be in the same place as those students who are really struggling with the question of do I or don鈥檛 I?

01:16:48 Speaker 6

And if I do, it鈥檚 dedicating so much time of my life, a minimum of like three years.

01:16:55 Speaker 6

To something or more and if I don鈥檛.

01:17:01 Speaker 6

Will that impact me in any way?

01:17:03 Speaker 6

Will I have regrets?

01:17:05 Speaker 6

I don鈥檛 know.

01:17:07 Speaker 6

So I鈥檓 still in that little liminal space of decision making.

01:17:11 Speaker 1

And I think it is a big decision when you鈥檙e actually already working in research.

01:17:15 Speaker 1

So then do a PhD I think is a is a big decision.

01:17:19 Speaker 1

Yeah, I understand that, Jane.

01:17:22 Speaker 1

And then Alison.

01:17:25 Speaker 7

What I鈥檓 thinking about the question, I think there are so many.

01:17:32 Speaker 7

It鈥檚 funny, but there鈥檚 so much I wish I could have.

01:17:36 Speaker 7

I wish I had known he left before I saw the PhD But I鈥檓 I just wanna focus on one of them.

01:17:44 Speaker 7

And that is I鈥檓 not being afraid to make a change.

01:17:49 Speaker 7

You know, sometimes we will feel that we鈥檝e come too far to stop or to go back or, you know, to change the direction whether the methodology you have chosen, the research purpose you have chosen, you know and then thinking about overspending, I鈥檝e read so much at.

01:18:09 Speaker 7

Those are stuff like that.

01:18:11 Speaker 7

But I I think what I would have, looking back, wish I had known that it was OK to make any change I felt was necessary at that time were done methodologically, whether in terms of my research public OK and research questions, things like that.

01:18:33 Speaker 1

That鈥檚 good advice.

01:18:34 Speaker 1

Thank you, Jane.

01:18:35 Speaker 1

Now listen.

01:18:37 Speaker 2

Uhm, well, when Joanna was speaking, I was reminded of something that my dad kept saying to me in that final year and I also had life going on in my final year of my PhD.

01:18:50 Speaker 2

I was expecting a baby.

01:18:51 Speaker 2

Was due as I was submitting, so it was kind of against the clock to get it in and.

01:18:55 Speaker 2

And my dad said you know you鈥檙e never going to finish it.

01:19:00 Speaker 2

You just have to decide to stop working on it and it鈥檚 that kind of knowing when that point is was having people around you can help you know when that point is because you could make your PhD.

01:19:02

Oh no.

01:19:10 Speaker 2

D last for your whole career.

01:19:11 Speaker 2

Uhm, but you can鈥檛.

01:19:13 Speaker 2

You need to get be getting on with the rest of your career 鈥檆ause that鈥檚 the exciting part.

01:19:16 Speaker 2

So having people around you.

01:19:18 Speaker 2

Who can help you know when to stop is really good and then my second one is much more.

01:19:25 Speaker 2

Is practical in a way and it鈥檚 about the examiners that you pick up and really try to be involved in that discussion with your supervisors because especially if you鈥檙e using something that鈥檚 a bit.

01:19:37 Speaker 2

Different or more creative? Uhm.

01:19:42 Speaker 2

I think supervisors push you towards examiners who have a really big footprint in the field or you know big status and that that can really benefit you in the future.

01:19:52 Speaker 2

You know, I鈥檝e had a brilliant examiner who also happens to be very prestigious and he鈥檚 been a great sort of support through my career since.

01:19:58 Speaker 2

Then because you know.

01:20:02 Speaker 2

But I鈥檝e also had students who we鈥檝e picked someone.

01:20:05 Speaker 2

You know, we鈥檝e picked people and then they鈥檝e had really difficult viewers because there鈥檚 this kind of way of thinking about what a PhD is and should be.

01:20:14 Speaker 2

That鈥檚 actually very old fashioned and what I was saying earlier about.

01:20:18 Speaker 2

Uhm, learning and you know in collectives and thinking about learning as a more.

01:20:23 Speaker 2

Kind of social cultural thing.

01:20:26 Speaker 2

It is changing slowly, but not everybody is on board with it and I think if we keep you know.

01:20:32 Speaker 2

There are certain ways that we can kind of push back against that as students and supervisors and picking an examiner who.

01:20:40 Speaker 2

Buys into those ideas of thinking about learning differently and thinking about what knowledge is in a different way.

01:20:44 Speaker 2

I think it鈥檚 probably more useful to launch your career than someone who鈥檚 just a big name on a, you know, PowerPoint somewhere.

01:20:51 Speaker 2

So yeah, so pick supervisors carefully.

01:20:55 Speaker 2

Sorry, examiners.

01:20:55 Speaker 2

Pick examiners.

01:20:59 Speaker 1

Thank you so much.

01:21:01 Speaker 1

I think it鈥檚 been such an interesting conversation and really lead into kind of some bigger themes.

01:21:06 Speaker 1

Obviously, we鈥檝e been focusing a lot on storytelling.

01:21:08 Speaker 1

But really like.

01:21:10 Speaker 1

Just on the consideration that鈥檚 needed when thinking about methodology on PhD鈥檚 on any projects that you鈥檙e involved in and how much to consider, just the practicalities, the ethics, the reason, being honest with yourself of why you鈥檙e choosing a methodology I think is really, really important. And also just I think you鈥檙e such a great example.

01:21:31 Speaker 1

Of collaborative work.

01:21:33 Speaker 1

And, you know, and just having that kind of, uhm, working with people that.

01:21:39 Speaker 1

You respect and really trust and that can have that support has really come through, I think during this conversation.

01:21:47 Speaker 1

So it鈥檚 been great.

01:21:48 Speaker 1

I鈥檝e loved chatting to you all.

01:21:49 Speaker 1

I鈥檝e learned so much about my own research as well, and I think it鈥檚 going to be really invaluable for students.

01:21:55 Speaker 1

Thank you all very much.

Speakers
Alison Buckler profile
Alison Buckler
Jennifer Agbaire
Yusra Price author profile
Yusra Price
Jane Nebe
Jane Nebe
Faith Mkwananzi profile photo
Faith Mkwananzi
Joanna Wheeler
Joanna Wheeler
Related Resources

To find out more about the Ibali project and the team visit: /hub/storytelling-research-in-international-education-and-development-a-resistance-to-or-reproduction-of-coloniality/

About this Podcast Series

The 糖心传媒 student podcast is a series featuring informal chats with academics and practitioners in the field of international comparative education. The podcast aims to explore the issues that are important to students and early career researchers, from fieldwork to ethics to innovative methodology, trying to get the answers you cannot get from an academic paper.

]]>
Ibali: co-creating learning spaces in and through storytelling research activities听 /hub/ibali-co-creating-learning-spaces-in-and-through-storytelling-research-activities/ Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:13:10 +0000 /?post_type=blog-post&p=32956 Two hands holding up handmade paper dice
Image Source: Yusra Price

In the 鈥Experiencing Education Partnerships鈥 Sub-theme at the 糖心传媒 2022 conference, we will do a creative session on storytelling as a research approach, drawing on our experiences of using the approach in international research. Participants are invited to engage with a series of interactive and creative techniques like those that we have employed in our research with a view to exploring and reflecting on the collaborative processes of storytelling for learning and knowledge production in practice.  


Using storytelling to understand how people make sense of their world is increasingly presented as a tool for providing richer insights into international education and development challenges. Advocates claim that it is inclusive, flattens hierarchies of power within research, connects elements of a situation, is enjoyable, therapeutic, sparks personal, social and political change, aligns with indigenous ontologies, exposes and challenges majority narratives and lifts research out of exclusionary academic spaces to engage wider publics. However, storytelling research also carries risks in relation to participant and facilitator well-being and the reproduction of static and potentially problematic ways of knowing. In this creative session at 糖心传媒 2022, we aim to highlight and generate insights into this creative research approach. 

We are a collective of academics and practitioners with extensive experience of leading and co-facilitating storytelling research projects, including our current AHRC-funded study that uses storytelling to explore commonalities and differences of how inclusion and exclusion are experienced across education systems in South Africa, Nigeria and the UK, combined with a critical, ethnographic evaluation of the storytelling research process. The study aims to understand how storytelling could be better and more ethically used in research, especially when working across socio-political and geographic boundaries.  

Our session will draw on two key features of our work that connect to the conference theme of 鈥淧artnerships in Education鈥. The first is our multi-country make-up as a collective of researchers from South Africa, Nigeria and the UK, and our experiences of working together to develop ideas around storytelling research.  In this respect our proposed session aligns with the subtheme 鈥淓xperiencing Education Partnerships鈥. The second feature is the positioning of our work within a capability and sociocultural framing that draws on Etienne Wenger鈥檚 conceptualisation of learning as a participatory process of becoming. The conceptual notion of partnerships in research is also aligned with sociocultural understandings of learning in a collective such as ours which Boaventura de Sousa Santos refers to as a 鈥榯ranslational contact zone鈥 involving the meeting, exchange, contestation and assimilation of ideas and knowledges from multiple cultural codes. It further ties into our storytelling approach itself which builds on our collaborator Joanna Wheeler鈥檚 work and focuses on lived experiences developed through an iterative group process.  Crucially, our approach views storymaking and storytelling as sociocultural activities 鈥 that is, as collaborative processes, even when the story is inherently personal. The iterative process of story generation around a specific issue is part of a process of articulating one鈥檚 own identity in relation to this issue but at the same time, through the collective process, gaining insights into how these experiences relate to wider trends. Here too our work strongly aligns with the 鈥淓xperiencing Education Partnerships鈥 sub-theme, with its emphasis on personal and collective experiences of learning: in our storytelling research, partnership is framed as co-creation of knowledge through a group process. 

The session is a 90-minute workshop designed to give participants an opportunity to use a series of creative techniques that are similar to those we use in in-depth storytelling processes. In taking a learning-by-doing approach, we intend for the session to generate reflections on the use of storytelling as a research approach, how creative techniques reflect different sociocultural understandings, and what a translational contact zone feels like in practice. These issues are especially relevant given a growing interest in working collaboratively across contexts.  

Group of people painting and sketching on a collaborative artwork
Image source: Jane Nebe

Participants will be invited to join at least two interactive storymaking activities involving image association, telling stories from images, developing comic strips and making storycubes. Facilitators and participants will work together to engage in these fun, art-based exercises which incorporate story elements of character, place, and emotion to surface the different ways that we interpret images and how we put these into a story. We will also screen two digital stories produced through our previous research, to help inform the overall discussion about the methodology. 

Overall, we are passionate about storytelling research and are particularly drawn to its collaborative nature. However, we recognise that more critical work needs to be done to support researchers to engage in storytelling research processes 鈥 and storytelling research partnerships – that are more epistemologically, geo-politically and ethically informed. This is crucial when working across contexts and more so, under the banner of so-called 鈥榙evelopment鈥 work 鈥 under which much international education research currently sits. In this session we aim to bring the core conversations that underpin our critical storytelling research study to the 糖心传媒 community, with the intention of enriching and furthering these conversations alongside fun and interactive practical activities. 

]]>
Experiencing Education Partnerships 鈥 What Realities? What Meanings? /hub/experiencing-education-partnerships-what-realities-what-meanings/ Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:23:56 +0000 /?post_type=blog-post&p=31750 Bangladeshi Primary School
Bangladeshi Primary School

Partnerships? Stop! Think! What first pops up in your mind at the idea of partnerships in education? What experiences prompted your first thoughts? Where did they come from and what do they mean?

Prominent in the descriptions of partnerships in international education are activities and relationships that involve global actors such as international donors and high-level national stakeholders such as Ministries of Education.  Partnerships between global agencies and specific governments often influence national educational policies and especially in the Global South,  are often themselves influenced by, because of colonial histories and postcolonial dependencies on foreign aid in terms of financing, information and specialists.  What is often not sufficiently captured is the place of key players at the lowest levels of the system within the range of things that tie into these stakeholder activities and relationships.

We think that academic and practice-based writings on local, context-based collaboration or partnership may contribute to localising problem-solving approaches. We argue elsewhere for example, concerning , that useful collaborations must take into account the viewpoints, considerations, activities as well as the adaptability and even defiance of local stakeholders that are most affected by the conditions on the ground. For us, this includes the collective and collaborative roles that educators, learners, parents, school committees, community members, researchers, local businesses and other agencies play to achieve or sometimes challenge national and international priorities, interests and agendas for teaching and learning and research. It also includes the ways that partnerships by and with high-level actors impact these collective efforts and vice-versa, and in turn shape how teaching-learning and research come to be experienced.  We are therefore more than delighted that 糖心传媒 2022 opens up an opportunity to address these and other important dimensions under the 鈥Experiencing Education Partnerships鈥 conference sub-theme.

In our experience in international education research and 鈥榙evelopment鈥 practice over the years, we have seen collaborative work on the ground alive and making a difference in learners鈥 experiences in different learning spaces.  In a small-scale qualitative study that we conducted on the due to the COVID-19 pandemic,  several different dimensions and dynamics of local partnerships, including between education and other sectors, were indicated as was the important role of lower-level stakeholders who put their hands on deck to reduce learning gaps resulting from school closures. One government education officer described some of it: 鈥淲e are collaborating with community cable TV network providers. We have made a pool of expert teachers who record classes, and the cable TV providers broadcast those in their local channel every morning and afternoon.鈥

Indeed, such collaborations are not new, both for improved learning experiences and educational research: they have only become more apparent in recent times and especially, during the pandemic.

We have listened to stories of how 鈥渂ig changes from top partnerships鈥, or 鈥渟mall changes from bottom partnerships鈥, or 鈥渋ncremental changes fostered through top-bottom partnerships鈥 have brought about improved educational experiences. But we have also witnessed challenges and tensions that may arise through and/or within local collaborations as well as multi-stakeholder and multi-level partnerships. And we have experienced how understandings, mediations and realities on the ground can disrupt and threaten on the one hand or promote and support on the other hand, what may be constituted as a successful partnership outcome.

As convenors of this sub-theme, we anticipate contextual nuances in the exploration of these and other ups and downs of experiences of education partnerships in the contributions we receive. We are excited to envisage new understandings that may emerge from a range of work based on different contexts, how the learnings might contribute to explaining the diversity of educational experiences and how these connect to both historical and contemporary socio-cultural, economic, political and other relevant local conditions: in our  experience, the existing knowledge of or partnership often undermines the understanding of diverse contexts. We also anticipate the troubling of predominant conceptualisations of educational partnership experiences in some contributions and the use of critical or creative approaches to thinking about and understanding such partnerships and experiences in others.  We hope to debate how these add to familiar discourses but we also expect to be blown away by other interesting areas related to our sub-theme that are not limited to our anticipations.

While appreciating the relevance of 鈥榖ig data鈥, our aim is to engage with discussions about small stories from partnership encounters on the ground that may develop our understanding of the internal and external forces that trigger partnerships, the values at play in shaping the nature of these partnerships and the ways that they interact with the educational ecosystem in any specific context.

So, partnerships? Yes! Think again! How might different experiences count? What might this mean? We keenly look forward to learning.

Jennifer Agbaire

Jennifer Agbaire is a Lecturer in Education at the Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies at The Open University. She currently Chairs the Open University鈥檚 Masters in Education Stage 2 Inclusive Practice module and is the Deputy Chair of the dissertation module. She also co-leads Early Career Researcher (ECR) development at the OU鈥檚 Centre for the Study of Global Development (CSGD). Her teaching, research, impact and knowledge exchange work centre issues of social inequalities, educational inclusion, equity and social justice 鈥 her work particularly stem from her interest in marginalised identities. Jennifer鈥檚 interest and work also extends to community-centred creative, co-creative and innovative research approaches as well as the ethics and inclusivity of research and professional practices. She is involved in interdisciplinary and multi-partnership projects in these areas, with experience that spans access, policy, leadership, teaching and teacher education across all levels of education.

Md. Shajedur Rahman

Md Shajedur Rahman is an ESRC Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Open University UK. Under this fellowship programme, he has been developing a framework for professional collaboration for primary teachers in Bangladesh. During his PhD, Rahman has developed interests in Teachers Professional Development (TPD) in the Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) and other resource-restricted contexts, International and Comparative Education, Ethnography (especially researchers鈥 positionality during ethnographic fieldwork), Critical Realism (focusing agency-structure analysis鈥檚 ability to reveal truth), decolonising educational research and digital badge for teachers鈥 professional development.

]]>
Storytelling research in international education and development: a resistance to, or reproduction of coloniality? /hub/storytelling-research-in-international-education-and-development-a-resistance-to-or-reproduction-of-coloniality/ Thu, 03 Feb 2022 12:56:29 +0000 /?post_type=blog-post&p=30653 women collaborating

Storytelling is gaining popularity as a methodology in the field of international education and development. It is seen to offer an antidote to modernist, big-data research that positions people at the centre of interventions as homogenous and, instead, connect the field with 鈥榬eal鈥 versions of people. Advocates claim that it is inclusive, flattens hierarchies of power within research, is enjoyable, therapeutic, highlights inequality, sparks personal, social and political change, aligns with indigenous ontologies, reveals minority narratives while exposing and challenging majority narratives and lifts research out of exclusionary academic spaces to engage wider publics.

We are a collective of education and inclusion researchers working in Nigeria, South Africa and the UK embarking on a new AHRC-funded project on storytelling. Through our research using storytelling approaches across a range of studies, over several decades, we have seen evidence of its positive potential. But we have also seen that positive outcomes are not always guaranteed. Storytelling research carries risks in relation to ethics, participant and facilitator well-being, the reproduction of colonial ways of generating knowledge and the reproduction of colonial domination over ways of knowing. The idealisation of storytelling research can reinforce inequality rather than challenge it.

We met through the Ibali Network 鈥 an AHRC/GCRF-funded initiative that brought together storytelling academics and practitioners from across the world (but with a particular focus on Sub-Saharan Africa). Through Ibali we identified that early career education and development researchers in African institutions are often steered towards data sciences and away from the creative arts. When storytelling is positioned as an 鈥榓ppropriate鈥 and 鈥榯raditional鈥 approach for research in lower-income countries, but students in higher-income countries are privileged in relation to learning about creative, arts-based approaches, it entrenches the idea that not only are the 鈥榮olutions鈥 to challenges in education seen to lie within higher-income country institutions, the capacity for researching these challenges creatively is too.

Furthermore, there is at least an element of transparency around how the 鈥榖ig data鈥 that dominates much of international education and development research limits diverse ways of knowing. We suggest that the framing of storytelling by higher-income countries (especially those which have a history of colonial domination) as an appropriate research approach for lower-income countries (especially those which have been colonised) gives the impression of valuing diverse ways of knowing, but risks controlling what kinds of stories and storytelling are used and/or are useful. Many storytelling approaches in development research draw on techniques popularised in the 1970s and 1980s by high-income country researchers and practitioners, which echoes what Sally Falk Moore called an 鈥榠nescapable epistemological paradox鈥: mediating indigenous ways of knowing through non-indigenous means. Shenila Khoja-Moolji suggests that development research that platforms 鈥榲oice鈥 represents an obsession with dialogue and is often used in a way that is incompatible with the epistemologies and genuine needs of research participants. Storyfied depictions of lives can be tokenistic, romanticised or reductive (or all three). On the other hand, as argued by Linda Tuhiwai Smith and Boaventura de Sousa Santos, the use of more 鈥榓uthentic鈥 and 鈥榣ocal鈥 storytelling approaches carries risks of exploitation, co-optation and appropriation.

So, does storytelling research reproduce or resist coloniality? The question can feel paralysing, but we are working together to respond to this question by interrogating, challenging, refining and improving our storytelling practice. We are developing a storytelling research study with young people and teachers in Nigeria, South Africa and the UK that is empirically focussed on ideas and experiences of educational inclusion/exclusion. However, in parallel we are planning a critical exploration of this storytelling work, undertaken by three ethnographers trained in the UK, South Africa and Nigeria respectively. The ethnographers will individually and collaboratively document and analyse the storytelling process in each country. They will explore how researchers and participants from different contexts and in different contexts make sense of storytelling as a meaningful approach to researching and articulating people鈥檚 lived experiences.

We do not consider this to be an autoethnography, but an iterative, critically reflective and dialogical research design where we are committed to learning about how we carry out and communicate storytelling research and committed to sharing this learning by researching 鈥榠n the open鈥. We will do this through an online Storytelling Research Hub (coming soon!) which will bring together ideas and debates on different ways of using story in education and development research, and the challenges, strategies and possibilities involved. The Hub will also showcase ideas from across our network around how researchers and practitioners can work more critically and creatively with storytelling approaches in specific contexts.

Ultimately, while we are passionate about storytelling research, we recognise that more critical work needs to be done to support researchers to engage in a process that is more epistemologically, geo-politically and ethically informed 鈥 especially when they are working across contexts and especially when they are working under the banner of 鈥榙evelopment鈥 work.

Follow us on Twitter to find out more.

Alison Buckler

Alison Buckler is a Senior Research Fellow at The Open University where she is Co-Deputy Director of the Centre for the Study of Global Development. Her work focuses on using creative and narrative approaches to researching education, and she is the co-founder of the Ibali Network which supports people interested in using storytelling methodologies. She has been a member of the 糖心传媒 Executive Committee since 2015, serving as Secretary between 2018-2020, and Vice-Chair between 2020-2024.

Jennifer Agbaire

Jennifer Agbaire is a Lecturer in Education at the Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies at The Open University. She currently Chairs the Open University鈥檚 Masters in Education Stage 2 Inclusive Practice module and is the Deputy Chair of the dissertation module. She also co-leads Early Career Researcher (ECR) development at the OU鈥檚 Centre for the Study of Global Development (CSGD). Her teaching, research, impact and knowledge exchange work centre issues of social inequalities, educational inclusion, equity and social justice 鈥 her work particularly stem from her interest in marginalised identities. Jennifer鈥檚 interest and work also extends to community-centred creative, co-creative and innovative research approaches as well as the ethics and inclusivity of research and professional practices. She is involved in interdisciplinary and multi-partnership projects in these areas, with experience that spans access, policy, leadership, teaching and teacher education across all levels of education.

Joanna Wheeler

Joanna is founder and director of TransformativeStory. Her current work focuses on how storytelling can cross social divides and challenge dominant political narratives of exclusion. Over the last 18 years, she has conducted more than 80 storytelling processes around the world, combining personal and collective forms of storytelling using drawing, dance, music, drama, photography, video, audio, and sculpture. She has worked with a wide range of groups, from activists against sexual violence in Cape Town to young people from southern Africa working for gender equity.

Faith W Mkwananzi

Faith Mkwananzi is Researcher at the University of the Free State, South Africa, and recipient of the 2018 Cape Town Ibali Storytelling Training Award. Her work centres on higher education, migration, youth, and development in Sub-Saharan Africa, and is interested in engaging creative participatory methodologies to bridge the gap between researchers and development practitioners and civil society at large.

Yusra Price

Yusra is an independent anthropologist, educator, researcher and facilitator who cannot settle on a single occupation but dabbles in many interrelated work practices. She holds a Masters in Anthropology from the University of Cape Town (UCT) and specializes in Education and Storytelling. At tertiary education level, her current focus is on pedagogy of methodologies within anthropology and the broader social sciences. She is interested in how researchers are cultivated and in the kinds of innovations educators have developed to foster research sensibilities that are contextually and ethically driven. She is a member and lead ethnographer for the iBali network, supported by The Open University, which will use a storytelling for transformation approach to understand inclusion and exclusion in education across South Africa, Nigeria and the United Kingdom. Her storywork is located in community engagement and advocacy where a participatory and people-centred approach tries to assist others in achieving social justice.

]]>